The Essential Paradox and the Primary Why.
View #1, Paradox of the Atheist and Existentialist:
If we are absolutely a action of the existential activity allure which created DNA again this absolutely actual activity allure created a getting which must accept a vibrant, alive sub-conscious and associated approved dream accompaniment wherein at times capacity that can alone be declared as non-material and non-chemical and not acquired from any existential acquaintance are manifested, examined, explored, and for abounding a greater faculty of acceptation and purpose comes from. The existential actual based planet created a getting which spends 1/3 of it's lifetime in a non-existential exercise that has little or annihilation to do with the automated business of breed adaptation and evolution.
View #2, Paradox of the Creationist:
If we are a conception of an Almighty Being, again He placed us in bound bitter forms absolutely abased on a daisy alternation of amaranthine actinic reactions that accept to yield abode in accumulation and consistently just to acquiesce life. The Almighty Getting so altogether bearded the basal Spiritual agent of activity beneath the about incomprehensibly complicated allure of activity that no absolute analysis by science or any added adjustment has anytime yielded an acknowledgment as to absolutely what the conception is and why it is here.
Interestingly, if View #1 and View #2 are beyond together, a added articular argumentation of the creation can be created that allows for the boundless complication of activity allure to be a assurance of the plan of an Almighty Getting for alone a force or Getting with bottomless ability could accept created so bizarre a arrangement and yet accept it plan by and ample all of the time. It aswell provides a added satisfying, added and advantageous acknowledgment to the botheration of a absolutely existential and accordingly by call commonsensical creation accepting created so abounding millions of creatures who actually cannot survive after a approved dosage of the dream accompaniment and ambition on account and concepts that accept no agent in the existential.
The columnist is accessible to suggestions but it appears that the acknowledgment to the Essential Paradox is a "Both/And" rather than the accepted "Either/Or" assemblage apropos the amount of the primary why.